Anthony Davis’ Stunning Admission: “I’d Probably Still Be in New Orleans If Pelicans Had Drafted Ja Morant”

The NBA landscape is often shaped by a single draft pick, a twist of fate that alters franchises and legacies. In a candid revelation that sends shockwaves through the league’s recent history, Los Angeles Lakers superstar Anthony Davis has reframed one of the most seismic player movements of the last decade. Davis stated that had the New Orleans Pelicans selected Ja Morant with the No. 1 overall pick in 2019, he would likely never have demanded a trade, potentially changing the destinies of three franchises forever.

The Infamous 2019 Draft: A Fork in the Road

The 2019 NBA Draft was a pivotal moment for the Pelicans. Just months earlier, Anthony Davis, the face of the franchise, had formally requested a trade. The Pelicans held the coveted No. 1 pick, awarded through the lottery odds stemming from their Davis-led struggles. The consensus top prospect was Zion Williamson, a generational athletic phenom from Duke. With the second pick, the Memphis Grizzlies were poised to select Ja Morant, the electric point guard from Murray State.

New Orleans selected Zion. Memphis happily scooped up Morant. The course was set. But according to Davis, an alternate reality was possible. “Looking back, if they had taken Ja, it changes everything,” Davis implied in his recent comments. “The vision would have been different. A young, hungry, explosive point guard like that? That’s a pairing you build around for a decade.” This admission forces a dramatic re-examination of the Pelicans’ decision-making and the fragile nature of team construction in the modern NBA.

Analyzing the “What If”: Davis, Morant, and a Lost Dynasty

To understand the weight of Davis’ statement, we must dissect the potential synergy of a Davis-Morant duo in New Orleans. At the time of the draft, Davis was a 26-year-old MVP candidate, a defensive juggernaut and offensive force. His frustration stemmed from organizational instability and a lack of consistent support.

Ja Morant, even as a rookie, represented the exact archetype Davis lacked: a fearless, playmaking engine who elevates teammates and commands defensive attention. Imagine the possibilities:

• Unstoppable Pick-and-Roll: Morant’s blinding speed and elite passing paired with Davis’ rolling gravity and finishing would have been a nightmare for defenses.
• Offensive Liberation: With Morant commanding double-teams, Davis would have faced less defensive crowding, potentially extending his prime and efficiency.
• Cultural Reset: Morant’s undeniable swagger and competitive fire could have reinvigorated the Pelicans’ identity, giving Davis a co-star with a matching killer instinct.

This pairing addressed Davis’ core complaint: a lack of a co-star capable of championship contention. Zion Williamson, while immensely talented, came with immediate questions about fit alongside Davis and long-term durability. Drafting Morant would have signaled a clear commitment to maximizing Davis’ window.

The Ripple Effect: How One Pick Reshaped Three Franchises

The decision to draft Zion Williamson set off a chain reaction that is still unfolding across the league. Let’s trace the monumental ripple effects.

For the Los Angeles Lakers: Without Davis’ trade demand, the Lakers likely don’t acquire him in the 2019 blockbuster deal. They don’t win the 2020 NBA Championship in the Orlando bubble. The LeBron James era in L.A. looks profoundly different, potentially without any titles. Their entire present and future trajectory is altered.

For the Memphis Grizzlies: No Ja Morant means no “Grit-N-Grind 2.0.” Memphis likely drafts another player (perhaps Darius Garland or RJ Barrett) and remains in the middle of the pack, missing out on the cultural phenomenon and playoff ascension Morant catalyzed.

For the New Orleans Pelicans: They potentially retain a top-5 player in Anthony Davis, add a top-5 point guard in Ja Morant, and build a perennial Western Conference powerhouse. The package of players and picks they received from the Lakers (Brandon Ingram, Lonzo Ball, Josh Hart, and multiple first-rounders) never arrives. Their current roster, built around Zion and Ingram, simply does not exist.

This single draft choice didn’t just affect a team; it shifted the balance of power, championship outcomes, and the careers of dozens of players.

Expert Predictions: The Legacy Implications and Future Lessons

Davis’ revelation is more than just a fascinating historical footnote; it’s a case study for general managers. It underscores that team-building is as much about player psychology and partnership fit as it is about collecting talent. The Pelicans chose the “best player available” in Zion, but Davis suggests they failed to consider the “best fit for their disgruntled superstar.”

Looking forward, this admission could influence future superstar trade demands. Stars may now more explicitly point to specific players or archetypes they want their teams to acquire or draft as a condition of their long-term commitment. The narrative of “surround me with the right pieces” gains even more potency.

For Davis, his legacy is secure: a championship with the Lakers cements his place among the greats. Yet, one can’t help but wonder about the legacy he left on the table—a potential dynasty in New Orleans as the veteran anchor to Morant’s meteoric rise. For Morant, it solidifies his standing as a franchise-altering talent, even in a hypothetical scenario.

Conclusion: The Ghost of a Dynasty That Never Was

Anthony Davis’ candid “what if” opens a portal to an NBA universe that fans can only dream about. A Davis-Morant partnership in New Orleans had the hallmarks of a perfect basketball marriage: the established elite big man and the dynamic young guard. It was a road not taken, a decision that prioritized a singular talent (Zion) over a synergistic partnership.

The Pelicans’ choice delivered them a different, still-promising future. But Davis’ statement confirms that the most impactful moves are sometimes the ones you don’t make. It reminds us that in the high-stakes chess game of the NBA, a single draft pick is never just about selecting a player; it’s about choosing a path, a partner, and a prophecy for your franchise. The ghost of that unrealized duo in New Orleans will now haunt discussions of modern NBA history, a stunning testament to how thin the line is between a breakup and a dynasty.

Source: Based on news from Yahoo Sports.

Image: CC licensed via warriorcare.dodlive.mil